By Paul Huth
Read or Download Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict PDF
Best family relationships books
Ideas FOR MY UNBORN SON is a set of conventional, funny, and urbane fatherly recommendation for boys. From the sartorial ("If you're tempted to put on a cowboy hat, resist") to the sensible ("Keep a duplicate of your letters. It makes it more straightforward to your biographer") to even a number of sure-fire hangover treatments ("There is not any higher treatment than a dip within the ocean"), the ebook of ideas and accompanying quotations is sort of easily an handbook for turning into a very good guy - industrious, considerate, captivating, and naturally, well-dressed.
How you can construct a thought in Cognitive technological know-how specifies the features of fruitful interdisciplinary theories in cognitive technological know-how and indicates how they range from the winning theories within the person disciplines composing the cognitive sciences. It articulates a style for integrating many of the disciplines effectively in order that unified, actually interdisciplinary theories are attainable.
Reading the ignored topic of non-disabled siblings in households the place there's a disabled baby, Brothers and Sisters of Disabled youngsters info the studies of those young children and explores what it potential to them to have a disabled brother or sister. via kin interviews and one-to-one conferences, Peter Burke files siblings' perspectives on concerns starting from the typical social regulations on their lives, the discrimination they face in school, via to their matters concerning the destiny.
Via an exam of 129 territorial disputes among 1950 and 1990, Paul Huth provides a brand new theoretical method for studying the overseas coverage habit of states, one who integrates insights from conventional realist in addition to family political methods to the learn of international coverage. Huth's method is premised at the trust that strong reasons of protection coverage has to be outfitted at the attractiveness that overseas coverage leaders are household politicians who're very aware of the household implications of overseas coverage activities.
- Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation
- The Journey Toward Reconciliation
- Family Therapy: First Steps Towards a Systemic Approach
- Eat, Play, Sleep: The Essential Guide to Your Baby's First Three Months
Additional info for Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict
A central concern of state leaders is to retain their position of domestic political power and to expand their base of political support when opportunities arise. Assumption 3. 11 10. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, 104 uses the term “self-help system” to describe how individual state security must be pursued in the international system. 11. One of the most important features of the modern state (be it democratic or authoritarian) is the far greater scope of national government involvement in the economy and society and the general public’s expectation that national political leaders are held responsible for the state of the economy and a wide range of social problems related to such basic issues as education, crime, and health.
Thus, I exclude the Polisario conflict with Morocco over the Western Sahara or Namibia’s dispute with South Africa over Walvis Bay. 13 My definition of a territorial dispute, with its emphasis on behavioral evidence of conflicting policy positions, excludes what might be described as “latent” disputes in which the leaders of governments might be expected to have (or are believed to harbor) territorial claims but fail to express them publicly or officially. As a result, there is no record of military or diplomatic actions taken by the challenger to contest the territorial rights of the target.
See Clarke Dunbar, “The Unification of Yemen,” Middle East Journal 45, no. 3 (1992): 472. 18. On the general problem of selection bias in social science research see Christopher Achen, The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986). Issues of selection bias in the study of conventional deterrence have been discussed by Christopher Achen and Duncan Snidal, “Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies,” World Politics 41, no. 2 (1989): 143–69; Paul Huth and Bruce Russett, “Testing Deterrence Theory,” World Politics 42, no.